Normally Functioning Inhibited Pacemaker Concomitant with Vertebral Nerve Stimulator

Clicks: 211
ID: 268258
1979
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #2 of 2 articles by views in pacing and clinical electrophysiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Electromagnetic inference is a recognized difficulty in concomitant cardiac pacing and nerve stimulation. A case is reported in which a vertebral nerve stimulator was implanted, with a transmitter antenna distal to the right nipple. Six months later, intermittent S-A block with Adams-Stokes attacks urgently necessitated cardiac pacing. The ECG lead II showed nerve stimulator potentials of 0.75 mV. Intracardiac electrogram with unipolar electrode registered potential of 0.25 mV, but with a bipolar system no such potentials were observed. A bipolar pacing electrode was therefore implanted, with an interference from the nerve stiumluator. Various aspects of interference are discussed.
Reference Key
levander‐lindgren1979pacingnormally Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors C. Sylvén,M Lindgren-Levander,M. Levander‐Lindgren;C. Sylvén;M Lindgren-Levander;M. Levander‐Lindgren;
Journal pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Year 1979
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-8159.1979.tb04285.x
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.