Long-term overall survival and prognostic score predicting survival: the IMPACT study in precision medicine

Clicks: 320
ID: 268019
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 8 articles by views in journal of hematology & oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background In 2007, we initiated IMPACT, a precision medicine program for patients referred for participation in early-phase clinical trials. We assessed the correlation of factors, including genomically matched therapy, with overall survival (OS). Patients and methods We performed molecular profiling (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) (genes ≤ 182) for patients with lethal/refractory advanced cancers referred to the Phase 1 Clinical Trials Program. Matched therapy, if available, was selected on the basis of genomics. Clinical trials varied over time and included investigational drugs against various targets (single agents or combinations). Patients were followed up for up to 10 years. Results Of 3487 patients who underwent tumor molecular profiling, 1307 (37.5%) had ≥ 1 alteration and received therapy (matched, 711; unmatched, 596; median age, 57 years; 39% men). Most common tumors were gastrointestinal, gynecologic, breast, melanoma, and lung. Objective response rates were: matched 16.4%, unmatched 5.4% (p < .0001); objective response plus stable disease ≥ 6 months rates were: matched 35.3% and unmatched 20.3%, (p < .001). Respective median progression-free survival: 4.0 and 2.8 months (p < .0001); OS, 9.3 and 7.3 months; 3-year, 15% versus 7%; 10-year, 6% vs. 1% (p < .0001). Independent factors associated with shorter OS (multivariate analysis) were performance status > 1 (p < .001), liver metastases (p < .001), lactate dehydrogenase levels > upper limit of normal (p < .001), PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations (p < .001), and non-matched therapy (p < .001). The five independent factors predicting shorter OS were used to design a prognostic score. Conclusions Matched targeted therapy was an independent factor predicting longer OS. A score to predict an individual patient’s risk of death is proposed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00851032, date of registration February 25, 2009.
Reference Key
kurzrock2019journallong-term Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou,David S. Hong,Jennifer J. Wheler,Gerald S. Falchook,Filip Janku,Aung Naing,Siqing Fu,Sarina Piha-Paul,Carrie Cartwright,Russell R. Broaddus,Graciela M. Nogueras Gonzalez,Patrick Hwu,Razelle Kurzrock;Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou;David S. Hong;Jennifer J. Wheler;Gerald S. Falchook;Filip Janku;Aung Naing;Siqing Fu;Sarina Piha-Paul;Carrie Cartwright;Russell R. Broaddus;Graciela M. Nogueras Gonzalez;Patrick Hwu;Razelle Kurzrock;
Journal journal of hematology & oncology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1186/s13045-019-0835-1
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.