Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of novices integrating lung ultrasound into the care of breathless older patients
Clicks: 257
ID: 267974
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
257 views
83 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 6 articles by views in Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: Lung ultrasound is frequently used to identify pulmonary oedema, using the ‘B line’ artefact. A small study in 2011 suggested that novice sonologists had a potential diagnostic accuracy of 85%, when performing the test without ...
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (34 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
brierley2015australasiansensitivity,
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kylie Baker, Luke Soong, Timothy Harding, Amy Wain, Jon Cheah, Geoffrey Mitchell, Stephen Brierley;Kylie Baker;Luke Soong;Timothy Harding;Amy Wain;Jon Cheah;Geoffrey Mitchell;Stephen Brierley; |
| Journal | Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00221.x
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.