Search for the pentaquark via the P0c̄s→K∗0K−p decay
Clicks: 341
ID: 267712
1999
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
341 views
52 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #12 of 201 articles by views in physics letters b
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 201 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We have searched for evidence of the production and decay of a neutral bound-state pentaquark, one of a predicted doublet of states: P0c̄s=|c̄suud〉 and P−c̄s=|c̄sddu〉. Specifically, we have searched for the decay P0c̄s→K∗0K−p in data from Fermilab experiment E791, in which a 500 GeV/c π− beam interacted with nuclear targets. We find mass-dependent upper limits at the 90% confidence level for the ratio of cross section times branching fraction of this decay relative to that for the decay Ds−→K∗0K−. The upper limits vary between 0.016 and 0.036 for M(P0c̄s) between 2.75 and 2.91 GeV/c2, assuming a pentaquark lifetime of 0.4 ps.
| Reference Key |
zhang1999physicssearch
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | E.M. Aitala,S. Amato,J.C. Anjos,J.A. Appel,D. Ashery,S. Banerjee,I. Bediaga,G. Blaylock,S.B. Bracker,P.R. Burchat,R.A. Burnstein,Tom Carter,H.S. Carvalho,N.K. Copty,L.M. Cremaldi,C. Darling,K. Denisenko,A. Fernandez,G.F. Fox,P. Gagnon,S. Gerzon,C. Gobel,K. Gounder,A.M. Halling,G. Herrera,G. Hurvits,C. James,P.A. Kasper,S. Kwan,D.C. Langs,J. Leslie,J. Lichtenstadt,B. Lundberg,S. MayTal-Beck,B.T. Meadows,Joao De Mello Neto,D. Mihalcea,R.H. Milburn,J.M. de Miranda,A. Napier,A. Nguyen,A.B. D'Oliveira,K. O'Shaughnessy,K.C. Peng,L.P. Perera,M.V. Purohit,B. Quinn,S. Radeztsky,A. Rafatian,N.W. Reay,J.J. Reidy,A.C. dos Reis,H.A. Rubin,D.A. Sanders,A.K.S. Santha,Alberto Santoro,A.J. Schwartz,M. Sheaff,R.A. Sidwell,A.J. Slaughter,M.D. Sokoloff,J. Solano,N.R. Stanton,R.J. Stefanski,K. Stenson,D.J. Summers,S. Takach,K. Thorne,A.K. Tripathi,S. Watanabe,R. Weiss-Babai,J. Wiener,N. Witchey,E. Wolin,S.M. Yang,D. Yi,S. Yoshida,R. Zaliznyak,C. Zhang;E.M. Aitala;S. Amato;J.C. Anjos;J.A. Appel;D. Ashery;S. Banerjee;I. Bediaga;G. Blaylock;S.B. Bracker;P.R. Burchat;R.A. Burnstein;Tom Carter;H.S. Carvalho;N.K. Copty;L.M. Cremaldi;C. Darling;K. Denisenko;A. Fernandez;G.F. Fox;P. Gagnon;S. Gerzon;C. Gobel;K. Gounder;A.M. Halling;G. Herrera;G. Hurvits;C. James;P.A. Kasper;S. Kwan;D.C. Langs;J. Leslie;J. Lichtenstadt;B. Lundberg;S. MayTal-Beck;B.T. Meadows;Joao De Mello Neto;D. Mihalcea;R.H. Milburn;J.M. de Miranda;A. Napier;A. Nguyen;A.B. D'Oliveira;K. O'Shaughnessy;K.C. Peng;L.P. Perera;M.V. Purohit;B. Quinn;S. Radeztsky;A. Rafatian;N.W. Reay;J.J. Reidy;A.C. dos Reis;H.A. Rubin;D.A. Sanders;A.K.S. Santha;Alberto Santoro;A.J. Schwartz;M. Sheaff;R.A. Sidwell;A.J. Slaughter;M.D. Sokoloff;J. Solano;N.R. Stanton;R.J. Stefanski;K. Stenson;D.J. Summers;S. Takach;K. Thorne;A.K. Tripathi;S. Watanabe;R. Weiss-Babai;J. Wiener;N. Witchey;E. Wolin;S.M. Yang;D. Yi;S. Yoshida;R. Zaliznyak;C. Zhang; |
| Journal | physics letters b |
| Year | 1999 |
| DOI |
10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00058-1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.