Gene inactivation and its implications for annotation in the era of personal genomics

Clicks: 148
ID: 267468
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #95 of 206 articles by views in genes & development

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 206 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The first wave of personal genomes documents how no single individual genome contains the full complement of functional genes. Here, we describe the extent of variation in gene and pseudogene numbers between individuals arising from inactivation events ...
Reference Key
gerstein2011genesgene Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Suganthi Balasubramanian, Lukas Habegger, Adam Frankish, Daniel G. MacArthur, Rachel Harte, Chris Tyler-Smith, Jennifer Harrow, Mark Gerstein;Suganthi Balasubramanian;Lukas Habegger;Adam Frankish;Daniel G. MacArthur;Rachel Harte;Chris Tyler-Smith;Jennifer Harrow;Mark Gerstein;
Journal genes & development
Year 2011
DOI
10.1101/gad.1968411
URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3012931/##B18
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.