Data blinding for the nEDM experiment at PSI

Clicks: 242
ID: 267195
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #11 of 19 articles by views in the european physical journal a

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Psychological bias towards, or away from, prior measurements or theory predictions is an intrinsic threat to any data analysis. While various methods can be used to try to avoid such a bias, e.g. actively avoiding looking at the result, only data blinding is a traceable and trustworthy method that can circumvent the bias and convince a public audience that there is not even an accidental psychological bias. Data blinding is nowadays a standard practice in particle physics, but it is particularly difficult for experiments searching for the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM), as several cross measurements, in particular of the magnetic field, create a self-consistent network into which it is hard to inject a false signal. We present an algorithm that modifies the data without influencing the experiment. Results of an automated analysis of the data are used to change the recorded spin state of a few neutrons within each measurement cycle. The flexible algorithm may be applied twice (or more) to the data, thus providing the option of sequentially applying various blinding offsets for separate analysis steps with independent teams. The subtle manner in which the data are modified allows one subsequently to adjust the algorithm and to produce a re-blinded data set without revealing the initial blinding offset. The method was designed for the 2015/2016 measurement campaign of the nEDM experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute. However, it can be re-used with minor modification for the follow-up experiment n2EDM, and may be suitable for comparable projects elsewhere.
Reference Key
zsigmond2021thedata Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors N. J. Ayres,G. Ban,G. Bison,K. Bodek,V. Bondar,E. Chanel,P.-J. Chiu,C. B. Crawford,M. Daum,S. Emmenegger,L. Ferraris-Bouchez,P. Flaux,Z. Grujić,P. G. Harris,N. Hild,J. Hommet,M. Kasprzak,Y. Kermaïdic,K. Kirch,S. Komposch,A. Kozela,J. Krempel,B. Lauss,T. Lefort,Y. Lemiere,A. Leredde,P. Mohanmurthy,A. Mtchedlishvili,O. Naviliat-Cuncic,D. Pais,F. M. Piegsa,G. Pignol,M. Rawlik,D. Rebreyend,I. Rienäcker,D. Ries,S. Roccia,D. Rozpedzik,P. Schmidt-Wellenburg,A. Schnabel,R. Virot,A. Weis,E. Wursten,J. Zejma,G. Zsigmond;N. J. Ayres;G. Ban;G. Bison;K. Bodek;V. Bondar;E. Chanel;P.-J. Chiu;C. B. Crawford;M. Daum;S. Emmenegger;L. Ferraris-Bouchez;P. Flaux;Z. Grujić;P. G. Harris;N. Hild;J. Hommet;M. Kasprzak;Y. Kermaïdic;K. Kirch;S. Komposch;A. Kozela;J. Krempel;B. Lauss;T. Lefort;Y. Lemiere;A. Leredde;P. Mohanmurthy;A. Mtchedlishvili;O. Naviliat-Cuncic;D. Pais;F. M. Piegsa;G. Pignol;M. Rawlik;D. Rebreyend;I. Rienäcker;D. Ries;S. Roccia;D. Rozpedzik;P. Schmidt-Wellenburg;A. Schnabel;R. Virot;A. Weis;E. Wursten;J. Zejma;G. Zsigmond;
Journal the european physical journal a
Year 2021
DOI
10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00456-1
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.