Reply to Kuriyama and Urushidani
Clicks: 7
ID: 267136
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.8
/100
7 views
6 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #983 of 1,084 articles by views in clinical infectious diseases
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,084 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To the Editor—We thank Drs Kuriyama and Urushidani for their comments regarding our systematic review. Our primary aim was to evaluate the effect of strategies
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (26 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
antoine2015clinicalreply1
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Roquilly, Antoine;Marret, Emmanuel;Abraham, Edward;Asehnoune, Karim; |
| Journal | clinical infectious diseases |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.