Comparison of ICD-9-based, retrospective, and prospective assessments of perioperative complications: assessment of accuracy in reporting

Clicks: 252
ID: 266762
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
an ICD-9-based coding of perioperative adverse events and major complications in a cohort of spine surgery patients revealed an overall complication incidence similar to that in a prospectively executed measure. In contrast, a retrospective review underestimated complication incidence. The ICD-9-bas …
Reference Key
pg2011journalcomparison Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Campbell PG;Malone J;Yadla S;Chitale R;Nasser R;Maltenfort MG;Vaccaro A;Ratliff JK;;
Journal Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21142455
Keywords
National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE humans pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine adult female male aged middle aged Comparative Study Prospective Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Incidence Retrospective Studies Cohort Studies hospitals postoperative complications / epidemiology* bias university / statistics & numerical data pmid:21142455 doi:10.3171/2010.9.spine10151 peter g campbell jennifer malone john k ratliff international classification of diseases / statistics & numerical data* medical audit / statistics & numerical data philadelphia postoperative complications / diagnosis* risk management / statistics & numerical data* spinal diseases / surgery* spinal fusion / statistics & numerical data spondylosis / surgery

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.