Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science
Clicks: 321
ID: 266398
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
321 views
44 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #14 of 32 articles by views in plos biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This Essay argues that success and impact metrics in science are based on a system that perpetuates sexist and racist ‘rewards’ by prioritizing citations and impact factors; the authors advocate shifting this outdated value system to advance science through principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.
| Reference Key |
davies2021plospromoting
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah W. Davies;Hollie M. Putnam;Tracy Ainsworth;Julia K. Baum;Colleen B. Bove;Sarah C. Crosby;Isabelle M. Côté;Anne Duplouy;Robinson W. Fulweiler;Alyssa J. Griffin;Torrance C. Hanley;Tessa Hill;Adriana Humanes;Sangeeta Mangubhai;Anna Metaxas;Laura M. Parker;Hanny E. Rivera;Nyssa J. Silbiger;Nicola S. Smith;Ana K. Spalding;Nikki Traylor-Knowles;Brooke L. Weigel;Rachel M. Wright;Amanda E. Bates; |
| Journal | plos biology |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
10.1371/journal.pbio.3001282
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.