Biomechanical analysis of movement strategies in human forward trunk bending. I. Modeling
Clicks: 297
ID: 266384
1970
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.2
/100
297 views
57 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 2 articles by views in biological cybernetics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Two behavioral goals are achieved simultaneously during forward trunk bending in humans: the bending movement per se and equilibrium maintenance. The objective of the present study was to understand how the two goals are achieved by using a biomechanical model of this task. Since keeping the center of pressure inside the support area is a crucial condition for equilibrium maintenance during the movement, we decided to model an extreme case, called “optimal bending”, in which the movement is performed without any center of pressure displacement at all, as if standing on an extremely narrow support. The “optimal bending” is used as a reference in the analysis of experimental data in a companion paper. The study is based on a three-joint (ankle, knee, and hip) model of the human body and is performed in terms of “eigenmovements”, i.e., the movements along eigenvectors of the motion equation. They are termed “ankle”, “hip”, and “knee” eigenmovements according to the dominant joint that provides the largest contribution to the corresponding eigenmovement. The advantage of the eigenmovement approach is the presentation of the coupled system of dynamic equations in the form of three independent motion equations. Each of these equations is equivalent to the motion equation for an inverted pendulum. Optimal bending is constructed as a superposition of two (hip and ankle) eigenmovements. The hip eigenmovement contributes the most to the movement kinematics, whereas the contributions of both eigenmovements into the movement dynamics are comparable. The ankle eigenmovement moves the center of gravity forward and compensates for the backward center of gravity shift that is provoked by trunk bending as a result of dynamic interactions between body segments. An important characteristic of the optimal bending is the timing of the onset of each eigenmovement: the ankle eigenmovement onset precedes that of the hip eigenmovement. Without an earlier onset of the ankle eigenmovement, forward bending on the extremely narrow support results in falling backward. This modeling approach suggests that during trunk bending, two motion units – the hip and ankle eigenmovements – are responsible for the movement and for equilibrium maintenance, respectively.
| Reference Key |
alexandrov1970biologicalbiomechanical
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | A. V. Alexandrov;A. A. Frolov;J. Massion;A. V. Alexandrov;A. A. Frolov;J. Massion; |
| Journal | biological cybernetics |
| Year | 1970 |
| DOI |
doi:10.1007/PL00007986
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.