Unravelling the quenching mechanisms of a luminescent Ru(II) probe for Cu(II).
Clicks: 356
ID: 2659
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
78.1
/100
356 views
243 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #10 of 76 articles by views in Chemistry, an Asian journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We have investigated the photophysical and photochemical features of a luminescent heteroleptic Ru(II)-polypyridyl probe and of its corresponding Ru(II)-Cu(II) dinuclear complex formed upon the analyte binding through extensive density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations. The molecular probe contains the tailored imidazo[4,5-f]-1,10-phenanthroline (IIP) ligand for simultaneously binding the Ru(II) core and the target metal ion in aqueous solution. We have rationalized the static photoluminescence quenching observed upon the Cu(II) coordination, on the grounds of distinct excited state deactivation mechanisms which are absent in the free Ru(II) complex probe. Additionally, the emission quenching found upon increasing the solution pH has also been investigated. When coordinated IIP deprotonates, the nature of the lowest excited state of its complex changes from (3)MLCT to (3)LLCT/(3)IL. The strong base-induced emission quenching can be understood in terms of both the energy-gap law, since the (3)LLCT/(3)IL states lie at a significantly lower energy than the (3)MLCT state increasing the contribution of non-radiative mechanisms, and the expected slower radiative rates from such (3)LLCT/(3)IL states. After Cu(II) binding, the lowest triplet excited state is similar to the analyte-free probe in both energy and electronic nature. However, Cu-centered non-radiative excited states, populated after photoinduced electron transfer and intersystem crossing processes, are responsible for the population drainage of the emissive state.
| Reference Key |
santos2015unravellingchemistry
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Santos, André Ribeiro;Escudero, Daniel;González, Leticia;Orellana, Guillermo; |
| Journal | Chemistry, an Asian journal |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1002/asia.201403340
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.