To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?

ما هي أقاليم العالم التي ينطبق عليها نموذج التكافؤ والهيمنة في الإدراك الاجتماعي؟

Clicks: 296
ID: 264190
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #15 of 56 articles by views in Nature human behaviour

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, Oosterhof and Todorov's valence-dominance model has emerged as the most prominent account of how people evaluate faces on social dimensions. In this model, two dimensions (valence and dominance) underpin social judgements of faces. Because this model has primarily been developed and tested in Western regions, it is unclear whether these findings apply to other regions. We addressed this question by replicating Oosterhof and Todorov's methodology across 11 world regions, 41 countries and 11,570 participants. When we used Oosterhof and Todorov's original analysis strategy, the valence-dominance model generalized across regions. When we used an alternative methodology to allow for correlated dimensions, we observed much less generalization. Collectively, these results suggest that, while the valence-dominance model generalizes very well across regions when dimensions are forced to be orthogonal, regional differences are revealed when we use different extraction methods and correlate and rotate the dimension reduction solution. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 5 November 2018. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1 .
على مدار السنوات العشر الماضية، برز نموذج التكافؤ والسيطرة لأوسترهوف وتودوروف بوصفه التفسير الأبرز لكيفية تقييم الأفراد للوجوه وفقاً للأبعاد الاجتماعية. وفي هذا النموذج، يشكّل بُعدان (التكافؤ والسيطرة) الأساس للأحكام الاجتماعية الصادرة على الوجوه. ونظراً لأن هذا النموذج قد طُوِّر واختُبِر في المقام الأول في مناطق غربية، فإنه لم يكن واضحاً ما إذا كانت هذه النتائج تنطبق على مناطق أخرى. ولقد تصدّينا لهذه المسألة من خلال إعادة تطبيق منهجية أوسترهوف وتودوروف عبر 11 منطقة جغرافية حول العالم، شملت 41 دولة و11,570 مشاركاً. وعندما استخدمنا استراتيجية التحليل الأصلية لأوسترهوف وتودوروف، عمَّت نتائج نموذج التكافؤ والسيطرة عبر مختلف المناطق. غير أننا عندما استخدمنا منهجية بديلة تسمح بوجود أبعاد مترابطة، لاحظنا قابلية تعميم أقل بكثير. وتُشير هذه النتائج بمجملها إلى أنه في حين يُعمَّم نموذج التكافؤ والسيطرة بصورة ممتازة عبر المناطق عند فرض تعامد الأبعاد، فإن الفروق الإقليمية تتكشف عند استخدام طرائق استخلاص مختلفة، وإجراء الترابط والتدوير لحل اختزال الأبعاد. تسجيل البروتوكول: قُبِل بروتوكول المرحلة الأولى لهذا التقرير المسجَّل من حيث المبدأ في 5 نوفمبر 2018. ويمكن الاطلاع على البروتوكول، كما قبلته المجلة، عبر الرابط: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1 .
Reference Key
jones2021tonature Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jones, Benedict C;DeBruine, Lisa M;Flake, Jessica K;Liuzza, Marco Tullio;Antfolk, Jan;Arinze, Nwadiogo C;Ndukaihe, Izuchukwu L G;Bloxsom, Nicholas G;Lewis, Savannah C;Foroni, Francesco;Willis, Megan L;Cubillas, Carmelo P;Vadillo, Miguel A;Turiegano, Enrique;Gilead, Michael;Simchon, Almog;Saribay, S Adil;Owsley, Nicholas C;Jang, Chaning;Mburu, Georgina;Calvillo, Dustin P;Wlodarczyk, Anna;Qi, Yue;Ariyabuddhiphongs, Kris;Jarukasemthawee, Somboon;Manley, Harry;Suavansri, Panita;Taephant, Nattasuda;Stolier, Ryan M;Evans, Thomas R;Bonick, Judson;Lindemans, Jan W;Ashworth, Logan F;Hahn, Amanda C;Chevallier, Coralie;Kapucu, Aycan;Karaaslan, Aslan;Leongómez, Juan David;Sánchez, Oscar R;Valderrama, Eugenio;Vásquez-Amézquita, Milena;Hajdu, Nandor;Aczel, Balazs;Szecsi, Peter;Andreychik, Michael;Musser, Erica D;Batres, Carlota;Hu, Chuan-Peng;Liu, Qing-Lan;Legate, Nicole;Vaughn, Leigh Ann;Barzykowski, Krystian;Golik, Karolina;Schmid, Irina;Stieger, Stefan;Artner, Richard;Mues, Chiel;Vanpaemel, Wolf;Jiang, Zhongqing;Wu, Qi;Marcu, Gabriela M;Stephen, Ian D;Lu, Jackson G;Philipp, Michael C;Arnal, Jack D;Hehman, Eric;Xie, Sally Y;Chopik, William J;Seehuus, Martin;Azouaghe, Soufian;Belhaj, Abdelkarim;Elouafa, Jamal;Wilson, John P;Kruse, Elliott;Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta;De La Rosa-Gómez, Anabel;Barba-Sánchez, Alan E;González-Santoyo, Isaac;Hsu, Tsuyueh;Kung, Chun-Chia;Wang, Hsiao-Hsin;Freeman, Jonathan B;Oh, Dong Won;Schei, Vidar;Sverdrup, Therese E;Levitan, Carmel A;Cook, Corey L;Chandel, Priyanka;Kujur, Pratibha;Parganiha, Arti;Parveen, Noorshama;Pati, Atanu Kumar;Pradhan, Sraddha;Singh, Margaret M;Pande, Babita;Bavolar, Jozef;Kačmár, Pavol;Zakharov, Ilya;Álvarez-Solas, Sara;Baskin, Ernest;Thirkettle, Martin;Schmidt, Kathleen;Christopherson, Cody D;Leonis, Trinity;Suchow, Jordan W;Olofsson, Jonas K;Jernsäther, Teodor;Lee, Ai-Suan;Beaudry, Jennifer L;Gogan, Taylor D;Oldmeadow, Julian A;Balas, Benjamin;Stevens, Laura M;Colloff, Melissa F;Flowe, Heather D;Gülgöz, Sami;Brandt, Mark J;Hoyer, Karlijn;Jaeger, Bastian;Ren, Dongning;Sleegers, Willem W A;Wissink, Joeri;Kaminski, Gwenaël;Floerke, Victoria A;Urry, Heather L;Chen, Sau-Chin;Pfuhl, Gerit;Vally, Zahir;Basnight-Brown, Dana M;Jzerman, Hans I;Sarda, Elisa;Neyroud, Lison;Badidi, Touhami;Van der Linden, Nicolas;Tan, Chrystalle B Y;Kovic, Vanja;Sampaio, Waldir;Ferreira, Paulo;Santos, Diana;Burin, Debora I;Gardiner, Gwendolyn;Protzko, John;Schild, Christoph;Ścigała, Karolina A;Zettler, Ingo;O'Mara Kunz, Erin M;Storage, Daniel;Wagemans, Fieke M A;Saunders, Blair;Sirota, Miroslav;Sloane, Guyan V;Lima, Tiago J S;Uittenhove, Kim;Vergauwe, Evie;Jaworska, Katarzyna;Stern, Julia;Ask, Karl;van Zyl, Casper J J;Körner, Anita;Weissgerber, Sophia C;Boudesseul, Jordane;Ruiz-Dodobara, Fernando;Ritchie, Kay L;Michalak, Nicholas M;Blake, Khandis R;White, David;Gordon-Finlayson, Alasdair R;Anne, Michele;Janssen, Steve M J;Lee, Kean Mun;Nielsen, Tonje K;Tamnes, Christian K;Zickfeld, Janis H;Rosa, Anna Dalla;Vianello, Michelangelo;Kocsor, Ferenc;Kozma, Luca;Putz, Ádám;Tressoldi, Patrizio;Irrazabal, Natalia;Chatard, Armand;Lins, Samuel;Pinto, Isabel R;Lutz, Johannes;Adamkovic, Matus;Babincak, Peter;Baník, Gabriel;Ropovik, Ivan;Coetzee, Vinet;Dixson, Barnaby J W;Ribeiro, Gianni;Peters, Kim;Steffens, Niklas K;Tan, Kok Wei;Thorstenson, Christopher A;Fernandez, Ana Maria;Hsu, Rafael M C S;Valentova, Jaroslava V;Varella, Marco A C;Corral-Frías, Nadia S;Frías-Armenta, Martha;Hatami, Javad;Monajem, Arash;Sharifian, MohammadHasan;Frohlich, Brooke;Lin, Hause;Inzlicht, Michael;Alaei, Ravin;Rule, Nicholas O;Lamm, Claus;Pronizius, Ekaterina;Voracek, Martin;Olsen, Jerome;Giolla, Erik Mac;Akgoz, Aysegul;Özdoğru, Asil A;Crawford, Matthew T;Bennett-Day, Brooke;Koehn, Monica A;Okan, Ceylan;Gill, Tripat;Miller, Jeremy K;Dunham, Yarrow;Yang, Xin;Alper, Sinan;Borras-Guevara, Martha Lucia;Cai, Sun Jun;Tiantian, Dong;Danvers, Alexander F;Feinberg, David R;Armstrong, Marie M;Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva;McCarthy, Randy J;Muñoz-Reyes, Jose Antonio;Polo, Pablo;Shiramazu, Victor K M;Yan, Wen-Jing;Carvalho, Lilian;Forscher, Patrick S;Chartier, Christopher R;Coles, Nicholas A;
Journal Nature human behaviour
Year 2021
DOI
10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2
URL
Keywords
structural connectivity massa intermedia human connectome project interthalamic adhesion probabilistic tractography

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.