Reliability of gastrointestinal barrier integrity and microbial translocation biomarkers at rest and following exertional heat stress.
Clicks: 326
ID: 263234
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
67.7
/100
326 views
222 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 7 articles by views in Physiological reports
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Exertional heat stress adversely distrupts (GI) barrier integrity and, through subsequent microbial translocation (MT), negativly impacts health. Despite widespread application, the temporal reliability of popular GI barrier integity and MT biomarkers is poorly characterised.Fourteen males completed two 80-min exertional heat stress tests (EHST) separated by 7-14 days. Venous blood was drawn pre, immediately- and 1-hr post both EHSTs. GI barrier integrity was assessed using the serum Dual-Sugar Absorption Test (DSAT), Intestinal Fatty-Acid-Binding Protein (I-FABP) and Claudin-3 (CLDN-3). MT was assessed using plasma Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein (LBP), total 16S bacterial DNA and Bacteroides DNA.No GI barrier integrity or MT biomarker, except absolute Bacteroides DNA, displayed systematic trial order bias (p ≥ .05). I-FABP (trial 1 = Δ 0.834 ± 0.445 ng ml ; trial 2 = Δ 0.776 ± 0.489 ng ml ) and CLDN-3 (trial 1 = Δ 0.317 ± 0.586 ng ml ; trial 2 = Δ 0.371 ± 0.508 ng ml ) were increased post-EHST (p ≤ .01). All MT biomarkers were unchanged post-EHST. Coefficient of variation and typical error of measurement post-EHST were: 11.5% and 0.004 (ratio) for the DSAT 90-min postprobe ingestion; 12.2% and 0.004 (ratio) at 150-min postprobe ingestion; 12.1% and 0.376 ng ml for I-FABP; 4.9% and 0.342 ng ml for CLDN-3; 9.2% and 0.420 µg ml for LBP; 9.5% and 0.15 pg µl for total 16S DNA; and 54.7% and 0.032 for Bacteroides/total 16S DNA ratio.Each GI barrier integrity and MT translocation biomarker, except Bacteroides/total 16S ratio, had acceptable reliability at rest and postexertional heat stress.
| Reference Key |
ogden2020reliabilityphysiological
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ogden, Henry B;Fallowfield, Joanne L;Child, Robert B;Davison, Glen;Fleming, Simon C;Edinburgh, Robert M;Delves, Simon K;Millyard, Alison;Westwood, Caroline S;Layden, Joseph D; |
| Journal | Physiological reports |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.14814/phy2.14374
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.