Eucharistic meal and eucharistic prayers in didache 9 and 10

Clicks: 223
ID: 26302
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in studia theologica - nordic journal of theology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Naloxone-Prescribing Practices in a Freestanding Rehabilitation Hospital. Stone SN, Curley N, Sheth M, Butler C, Margolis S.OBJECTIVE: The study aims to determine whether Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation physicians offer naloxone per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines to patients at the highest risk of complications from opioid treatment and whether there is a difference between inpatient and outpatient naloxone prescribing. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review on 389 adults (outpatient n = 166; inpatient n = 223) from May 4 to May 31, 2022, at an academic rehabilitation hospital. Prescribed medications and comorbidities were evaluated to determine whether Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for offering naloxone were met and whether naloxone was offered. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine opioid prescriptions were written for 102 outpatients; 61 qualified for naloxone (morphine milliequivalent range = 10-1080, mean = 158.08). On inpatient, 68 patients received 86 opioid prescriptions; 35 qualified for naloxone (morphine milliequivalent range = 3.75-246, mean = 62.36). Overall, there was a significantly lower rate of opioid prescriptions for inpatients (30.49%) than outpatients (61.45%) ( P < 0.0001), a nonsignificant lower rate of inpatient (51.47%) than outpatient (59.80%) "at-risk" prescriptions ( P = 0.351), and a weakly significant lower rate of naloxone prescribing for inpatient (2.86%) than outpatient visits (8.20%) ( P < 0.0519). CONCLUSIONS: At this rehabilitation hospital, there was a low rate of naloxone prescribing by inpatient and outpatient providers, with a higher rate occurring in the outpatient than inpatient setting. More research is needed to understand this prescribing trend to determine potential interventions. Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002305 PMID: 37339054 [Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
Reference Key
koch2010eucharisticstudia Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Koch, D.
Journal studia theologica - nordic journal of theology
Year 2010
DOI
10.1080/0039338X.2010.517382
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.