3D-printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.
Clicks: 343
ID: 26149
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
75.6
/100
343 views
230 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #3 of 5 articles by views in tissue engineering part a
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Although many spinal biologic products are available, a cost-effective and universally safe bone graft substitute material for spine fusion has yet to be proven. Additive manufacturing has enhanced our ability to utilize different biomaterials to engineer structurally stable bone grafts. Here, components with both osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties (synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) particles in a poly(lactide-co-glycolide), PLG, elastomer) were 3D-printed into a scaffold to promote osteointegration with an end goal of spine fusion without the need for recombinant growth factor. "3D-Paints" containing a minority component of PLG and varying volumetric ratios of synthetic HA and human DBM particles (1:0, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 0:1 HA:DBM) were printed into scaffolds for bilateral implantation at the L4-L5 transverse processes in female Sprague-Dawley rats (N=12/group). Manual palpation was used to evaluate spine fusion 8 weeks post-operatively. Osteointegration and de novo bone formation within struts were evaluated by laboratory and synchrotron microCT and histology. The 3:1 HA:DBM composite achieved both the highest mean fusion score and fusion rate (92%), which was significantly greater than the 3D-printed DBM-only scaffold (42%). New bone was identified extending from the transverse processes into adjacent scaffold macropores, and osteointegration scores (extent of bone growth into scaffolds) correlated with fusion scores. Strikingly, synchrotron microCT imaging showed that the combination of HA and DBM resulted in the growth of bone-like spicules around the DBM particles inside scaffold struts. These mineralized spicules were not observed in DBM-only scaffolds, suggesting that de novo spicule formation requires both the HA and DBM components. This 3D-printable composite scaffold exploits the advantages of additive manufacturing and the combined properties of HA and DBM to promote de novo bone formation and stabilize the spine in a rat model. Thus, this recombinant growth factor-free material may have the potential to overcome the limitations of currently-used bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion.
| Reference Key |
driscoll20193dprintedtissue
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Driscoll, J Adam;Lubbe, Ryan;Jakus, Adam;Chang, Kevin;Haleem, Meraaj;Yun, Chawon;Singh, Gurmit;Schneider, Andrew;Katchko, Karina M;Soriano, Carmen;Newton, Michael;Maerz, Tristan;Li, Xin;Baker, Kevin;Hsu, Wellington;Shah, Ramille N;Stock, Stuart R;Hsu, Erin L; |
| Journal | tissue engineering part a |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0166
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.