Post-publication sharing of data and tools
Clicks: 221
ID: 261143
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
221 views
50 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #186 of 375 articles by views in Nature
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 375 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Despite existing guidelines on access to data and bioresources, good practice is not widespread. A meeting of mouse researchers in Rome proposes ways to promote a culture of sharing.
| Reference Key |
schofield2009naturepost-publication
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul N. Schofield;Tania Bubela;Thomas Weaver;Lili Portilla;Stephen D. Brown;John M. Hancock;David Einhorn;Glauco Tocchini-Valentini;Martin Hrabe de Angelis;Nadia Rosenthal;Paul N. Schofield;Tania Bubela;Thomas Weaver;Lili Portilla;Stephen D. Brown;John M. Hancock;David Einhorn;Glauco Tocchini-Valentini;Martin Hrabe de Angelis;Nadia Rosenthal; |
| Journal | Nature |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
doi:10.1038/461171a
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.