Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Clicks: 390
ID: 261083
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 19 articles by views in Circulation

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This (CPR) on basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 22 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review. Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest. The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.
Reference Key
olasveengen2020adultcirculation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Olasveengen, Theresa M;Mancini, Mary E;Perkins, Gavin D;Avis, Suzanne;Brooks, Steven;Castrén, Maaret;Chung, Sung Phil;Considine, Julie;Couper, Keith;Escalante, Raffo;Hatanaka, Tetsuo;Hung, Kevin K C;Kudenchuk, Peter;Lim, Swee Han;Nishiyama, Chika;Ristagno, Giuseppe;Semeraro, Federico;Smith, Christopher M;Smyth, Michael A;Vaillancourt, Christian;Nolan, Jerry P;Hazinski, Mary Fran;Morley, Peter T;, ;
Journal Circulation
Year 2020
DOI
10.1161/CIR.0000000000000892
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.