Risk Mitigation in a Meat Supply Chain with Options of Redirection

Clicks: 187
ID: 260703
2020
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #213 of 275 articles by views in sustainability

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 275 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present how a higher income can be achieved by developing a broader and more accurate planning framework and control perishability from stable to fork if it is possible to redirect the shipments in the case of increasing perishability dynamics or longer time delays on the roads. It also gives the answer to the question of how such a Supply Chain (SC) can be evaluated using Net Present Value (NPV) approach. The procedures include a real-time calculation and communication about the remaining shelf life (RSL) during transportation and other logistic manipulations from one chain node to another if the time to exceed the contractually stipulated Customer Remaining Shelf Life (CRSL) is distributed by known distribution. Planning and control on the skeleton of the extended material requirements planning (MRP) model are advised, where time delays and their impact on the CRSL can be easily calculated. The changes in the NPV at contractually stipulated CRSL are calculated dynamically in real-time. Smart devices, tracking temperature, humidity, and gas concentration enable such reports immediately after detecting a high probability that CRSL, as stipulated in a contract, will not be achieved, based on the known parameters of the exponential distribution of the remaining shelf life as a time to failure at each node of the graph. The model includes possibilities to deliver the meat to the local market or to the reverse logistics plants in the nodes of the remaining route, if the expected contractually stipulated CRSL becomes too high. On this way, shortening unnecessary routes further contributes to less pollution.
Reference Key
bogataj2020sustainabilityrisk Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors David Bogataj;Domen Hudoklin;Marija Bogataj;Vlado Dimovski;Simon Colnar;Bogataj, David;Hudoklin, Domen;Bogataj, Marija;Dimovski, Vlado;Colnar, Simon;
Journal sustainability
Year 2020
DOI
10.3390/su12208690
URL
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8690/htm
Keywords
risk mitigation perishable goods remaining shelf life net present value (npv) rescheduling closed loop supply chain (clsc)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.