the paradox of adult asthma control: “who’s in control anyway?”
Clicks: 12
ID: 260512
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.3
/100
12 views
4 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #140 of 165 articles by views in religions
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 165 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Surveys of Canadian patients with asthma and their physicians consistently report satisfaction with asthma management; however, when objective indicators are used, these same surveys also observe very poor levels of asthma control. The reasons for this apparent discrepancy, with an emphasis on the factors influencing adherence to therapy, are explored in the present review. Clues to the identification of patients at risk of dying from asthma and an approach to difficult asthma are discussed.
| Reference Key |
hodder2007canadianthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rick Hodder |
| Journal | religions |
| Year | 2007 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2007/975134
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.