genetic diversity among sugarcane (saccharum spp.) varieties using molecular markers

Clicks: 256
ID: 260237
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The genetic base of today's sugarcane cultivars appears to be narrow and could be the reason for current slow progress in improving sugarcane crops. Sixty-three primer pairs (producing 263 polymorphic fragments) flanking simple sequence repeats or micro-satellites were used for assessing the genetic variability of five S. officinarum clones and 33 sugarcane cultivars used in CENICAÑA breeding projects, selected for their economic and agronomic im-portance in several Central and South-American countries. NTSYS (Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analy-sis System) and SAS (Statistical Analysis System) statistical software was used to analyse data. The number of alleles recorded per marker ranged from 1 to 16 (mean = 5). Cluster analysis showed a clear separation of cultivars from S. officinarum clones. The average of genetic similarity between sugarcane genotypes studied was 0.664, while genetic diversity analysis revealed a very different group (H: 0.973). An interesting results concerned CC 91-1880 distribu-tion very close to that of Q genotypes from Australia and also S. officinarum clones, suggesting that this cultivar would be a good candidate for further studies by breeders. The results obtained are useful for CENICAÑA's breed­ing program because, in spite of the genetic homogeneity present in today's sugarcane cultivars, it is clear that allelic variants are present in some of these cultivars and could be used in the new breeding projects. Key words: Sugarcane, genetic diversity, microsatellites, molecular markers, Saccharum officinarum.
Reference Key
riascos2003revistagenetic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;John J. Riascos;Jorge I. Victoria;Fernando Angel
Journal gigascience
Year 2003
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.