the weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!

Clicks: 124
ID: 259911
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #43 of 74 articles by views in green chemistry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219 The article adresses the weight of principles theory, according to the contours drawn by the neoconstitutionalism. The weight of principles model has been suffering from solid and emphatic criticisms, since it submits the judicial discourse to a deep deficit of rationality and legitimacy, opening the way to a clear usurpation of the legislative authority by a theoretical model that allows the empire of subjective decisionism and judicial moralism. This leads to the need of establishing material and procedimental limits that are capable to ensure a rational application the system, wich is essential to legitimate and justify the decisions about the conflift of principles and interests.
Reference Key
cristvam2017sequncia:the Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;José Sérgio da Silva Cristóvam
Journal green chemistry
Year 2017
DOI
10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.