Colorectal cancer guidelines seldom include the patient perspective.

Clicks: 225
ID: 25927
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #48 of 75 articles by views in journal of clinical epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
To describe how colorectal practice guidelines (PGs) incorporate the patient perspective.We searched in the GIN library, MEDLINE, National Guideline Clearinghouse, NHS evidence database and Trip-database. Two authors independently selected the PGs.. We considered recommendations rated or worded as weak or conditional, or suggesting multiple options, as potentially preference sensitive. Two authors independently evaluated if, in potentially sensitive recommendations, the patient perspective was incorporated.We included twenty-eight PGs that contained 588 recommendations, being 256 potentially preference-sensitive. Ten PGs (36%) included patients in the development process, and twelve (43%) provided information about patients' perspectives. Nine PGs (32%) included recommendations in which the patient perspective was explicitly considered, and 13 (46.4%) that recommended a discussion with the patient. From a total of 588 recommendations, 9.7% (25/256) of potentially preference-sensitive recommendations considered the patient perspective. The inclusion of patients in the development process was associated with a more frequent incorporation of the patient perspective in potentially preference sensitive recommendations (70% vs 0%, p<0.001).Guideline users should be aware that the incorporation of the patient perspective in colorectal cancer PGs is suboptimal. Guideline developers should make efforts to incorporate the patient perspective, especially in preference-sensitive recommendations.
Reference Key
selva2019colorectaljournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Selva, A;Sanabria, A J;Niño de Guzman, E;Ballesteros, M;Selva, C;Valli, C;Zhang, Y;Yepes-Nuñez, J J;Solà, I;Schünemann, H;Alonso-Coello, P;
Journal journal of clinical epidemiology
Year 2019
DOI
S0895-4356(19)30179-9
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.