business, arguing and revolutions: entrepreneurial initiative as social innovation tool
Clicks: 250
ID: 259135
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
250 views
50 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #77 of 121 articles by views in BMC genomics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 121 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to discuss the conditions in which social innovation acquires actual contours and values that are reflected in certain territorial segments, whereas the accrued intentions idealized scope are linked to actors who hold well-defined entrepreneurial characteristics and that such purposes are settled in factors such as aesthetics – as element of perception of the beautiful nature that social action is – the argumentative discourse – as legitimate means to promote the involvement of new actors through the substantiation of a new mindset toward the common good – and the prestige designed to construct collaboration by such agents of change – as a result of overlap between the state of the art, due to the desire to change a situation which requires the intervention of holders agents of skills and knowledge, and intelligent argument use here defined as an effective tool to mobilize people and minds aiming at a consensus in favor of a specific community. Despite the literature focus their findings in social innovation processes arising from business initiatives – a fact that can not be ignored given the advancement of the relations established towards the balance of forces gravitating socioeconomic universe – the challenge of this test is to provoke reflection on the argument as an instrument to carry out the most urgent social innovations, whose domain is the responsibility of the entrepreneur. The work is supported in ideas Marcy (2015), CRISES, (2004), Perelman (2004), Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), Herrera (2015) and Matei and Antonie (2015).
| Reference Key |
guimares2016gesto.orgbusiness,
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Jairo de Carvalho Guimarães |
| Journal | BMC genomics |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
dx.doi.org/10.21714/1679-18272016v14n2.p355-366
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.