Single vs dual rod constructs in early onset scoliosis treated with magnetically controlled growing rods.
Clicks: 303
ID: 258336
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
303 views
61 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5 of 5 articles by views in Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Non-invasive distractions of recently introduced magnetically controlled growing rods (MGCRs) spare multiple operations in the surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS). Since the costs of the implants are high, concerns have been raised regarding cost-effective, optimal but safe MGCR options: single or dual constructs.To report deformity control, spinal growth and complication incidence in EOS patients treated with MCGR singleor dual-rod constructs.The study involved 47 patients with MCGRs inserted at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London (UK) in 2013-2014, who were followed up for at least 1 year. In 32 patients, T1-S1 distances, and coronal and sagittal curves were measured on preoperative and postoperative X-rays, and at a one-year follow-up. All complications were recorded. The patients were analyzed in 2 groups: those with single-rod constructs (24 patients) and those with dual-rod constructs (23 patients).Comparing postoperative with one-year follow-up measurements, T1-S1 length increase was better in the dual-rod group (3.29%) than in the single-rod group (0.34%) (p = 0.031). In the whole series, mean scoliosis magnitude dropped by 27.5% at the one-year follow-up. The dual-rod group showed better mean curve correction: 36.5% compared to 15.3% in the single-rod group (p = 0.0076). Overall, 34.04% of the patients had complications: 45.8% in the single-rod group and 30.4% in the dual-rod group (p = 0.0413). Metalwork failure was observed in 8 patients, lengthening problems in 5 and wound infections in 2; there was also 1 case of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Preoperative hyperkyphosis was associated with more complications (75%, p = 0.037), most of which were metalwork failure (41.6%).The MCGRs are efficient at controlling EOS; however, the complication rate is high, particularly in single-rod constructs. The use of dual-rod constructs allows for better curve control, greater T1-S1 length increase and a lower complication rate.
| Reference Key |
urbaski2020singleadvances
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Urbański, Wiktor;Tucker, Stewart;Ember, Thomas;Nadarajah, Ramesh; |
| Journal | Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.17219/acem/126289
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.