classical test theory and item response theory: two understandings of one high-stakes performance exam

Clicks: 208
ID: 257893
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #9 of 31 articles by views in chemistry - an asian journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Language testing professionals as well as teacher educators have articulated the need for a broad variety stakeholders, including classroom teachers, to develop assessment literacy. In this paper we argue that when teachers are involved in local development projects, they have the opportunity—and the need—to expand their assessment knowledge and skills beyond what is necessary for conducting principled classroom assessments. We further claim that a particular analytic approach, Rasch analysis, should be considered a possible element of this expanded assessment literacy. To this end, we use placement exam data from one Colombian university to illustrate how Rasch analysis differs from—and can usefully complement—classical test theory.
Reference Key
janssen2014colombianclassical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Gerriet Janssen;Valerie Meier;Jonathan Trace
Journal chemistry - an asian journal
Year 2014
DOI
10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.2.a03
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.