fmea in zmanjševanje reklamacij odjemalcev

Clicks: 259
ID: 257232
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #7 of 14 articles by views in soil and sediment contamination

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Research Question (RQ): Does the introduction of the FMEA method in the organization reduce the number of customer complaints? Are the results of the introduction of DFMEA and PFMEA functions and processes immediately shown, or show improvement only after a certain period of time. Purpose: Evaluation of the real situation and preparation and implementation of the quality method for identifying and assessing the risks and opportunities that will be met by all the requirements of the new standard ISO 9001: 2015 and consequently the handling of complaints. The aim of the research is to determine how the introduction of FMEA in the organization effects on the customer complaints. Method: We used an organization database containing the number of DFMEA and PFMEA functions introduced and the number of complaints from 2015 to 2017. For analysis we used descriptive statistics, multiple regression, Pearson correlation coefficient and dependent ANOVA test. Results: The introduced methodology for identifying and assessing the risks of the FMEA (comprehensive quality tool) in the field of research and development, i.e. DFMEA and for the field of processes i.e. PFMEA. We have confirmed a significant reduction in customer complaints due to the introduction of DFMEA and PFMEA functions and processes. The improvement has been shown two years after its launch. Organization: For an organization, this is a big step in terms of advancement towards TQM. It means the transition to a new standard or a new quality system ISO 9001:2015, and thus the introduction of a process approach, the operation of the PDCA cycle, and the introduction of risks and opportunities at all levels in the organization or in all areas to think on the basis of risk. Society: The results are more favorable for the use of our products, because of the more reliable production, the companies are more competitive, productivity increases, the costs of non-quality are reduced, and emissions are reduced to the environment. Originality: The introduced method for identifying and assessing FMEA risks, although not required by the ISO 9001: 2015 standard. Limitations/Future Research: As part of our research, we were limited to only one company where the introduction of the FMEA method was remunerated. In order to get a wider picture of the results of the FMEA introduction, the research should be extended to several companies that have already introduced the FMEA method.
Reference Key
pove2018revijafmea Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Sandi Povše;Franc Brcar
Journal soil and sediment contamination
Year 2018
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.