vibration isolation review: ii. shock excitation

Clicks: 41
ID: 257120
1996
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #244 of 275 articles by views in Nano letters

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 275 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This is the second part of a two part review of shock and vibration isolation. It covers three distinct categories of shock excitation—pulselike shock, velocity shock, and complex shock—and discusses the means that are available in each case to measure the effectiveness of shock mitigation by the imposition of flexible connections between the isolated system and its base.
Reference Key
nelson1996shockvibration Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;F.C. Nelson
Journal Nano letters
Year 1996
DOI
10.3233/SAV-1996-3605
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.