Evaluating the Accuracy of Results for Teacher Implemented Trial-Based Functional Analyses.
Clicks: 147
ID: 25645
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
69.8
/100
138 views
113 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) allows for the systematic and experimental assessment of challenging behavior in applied settings. The purposes of this study were to evaluate a professional development package focused on training three Head Start teachers to conduct TBFAs with fidelity during ongoing classroom routines. To assess the accuracy of the TBFA results, the effects of a function-based intervention derived from the TBFA were compared with the effects of a non-function-based intervention. Data were collected on child challenging behavior and appropriate communication. An A-B-A-C-D design was utilized in which A represented baseline, and B and C consisted of either function-based or non-function-based interventions counterbalanced across participants, and D represented teacher implementation of the most effective intervention. Results showed that the function-based intervention produced greater decreases in challenging behavior and greater increases in appropriate communication than the non-function-based intervention for all three children.
| Reference Key |
rispoli2015evaluatingbehavior
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rispoli, Mandy;Ninci, Jennifer;Burke, Mack D;Zaini, Samar;Hatton, Heather;Sanchez, Lisa; |
| Journal | behavior modification |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1177/0145445515590456
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.