"a eloqüência farfalhante da tribuna do júri": o tribunal popular e a lei em nelson hungria "a eloqüência farfalhante da tribuna do júri": the people's court and the law in nelson hungria
Clicks: 41
ID: 256420
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
12.0
/100
41 views
12 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #15 of 25 articles by views in comunicata scientiae
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Este artigo pretende analisar a questão do júri no pensamento do penalista Nelson Hungria levando em consideração o contexto histórico das transformações sofridas pelas instituições penais durante o Estado Novo (particularmente as leis sobre o júri e os códigos penal e de processo penal de 1940 e 1941 respectivamente), até o post scriptum do percurso com as modificações trazidas pela Constituição de 1946 e pela lei 268 de 1947 e os seus escritos mais tardios. O aspecto chave a ser considerado nesse percurso é a (in)distinção no uso por parte de Hungria dos argumentos do tecnicismo jurídico-penal em relação àqueles do positivismo criminológico dependendo do contexto histórico.
This article aims to explore the issue of the jury in Nelson Hungria's thought considering the historical context of the transformations suffered by the criminal law institutions during the "Estado Novo" (particularly the laws on the jury and the criminal code - 1940 - and criminal procedure code - 1941) to the post scriptum of the process with the changes brought by the Constitution of 1946 and the law 268 of 1947 and his later writings. The key aspect to be considered in this process is the (in)distinction used by Hungria of the arguments of the criminal-legal technicism in relation to those of criminological positivism depending on historical context.
This article aims to explore the issue of the jury in Nelson Hungria's thought considering the historical context of the transformations suffered by the criminal law institutions during the "Estado Novo" (particularly the laws on the jury and the criminal code - 1940 - and criminal procedure code - 1941) to the post scriptum of the process with the changes brought by the Constitution of 1946 and the law 268 of 1947 and his later writings. The key aspect to be considered in this process is the (in)distinction used by Hungria of the arguments of the criminal-legal technicism in relation to those of criminological positivism depending on historical context.
| Reference Key |
sontag2009histria"a
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ricardo Sontag |
| Journal | comunicata scientiae |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0101-90742009000200010
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.