comparison of four different pain relief methods during hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled study
Clicks: 146
ID: 255814
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
146 views
12 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #72 of 128 articles by views in chemistryselect
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 128 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly used method for evaluating the anatomy and patency of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and is an important tool in the evaluation of infertility. The most frequent side effect is the pain associated with the procedure.
| Reference Key |
unlu2015paincomparison
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Bekir Serdar Unlu;Mehmet Yilmazer;Gulengul Koken;Dagistan Tolga Arioz;Ebru Unlu;Elif Dogan Baki;Cemile Kurttay;Osman Karacin |
| Journal | chemistryselect |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2015/306248
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.