efficacy of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clicks: 8
ID: 255711
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
2.1
/100
8 views
7 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #185 of 188 articles by views in colloids and surfaces a: physicochemical and engineering aspects
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 188 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background. Controversies on the utility of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass (LMGB) in weight loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) control still exist. Methods. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Review Manager was used to perform the meta-analysis and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and/or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to evaluate the overall size effect. Results. The literature search identified 16 studies for systematic review and 15 articles for meta-analysis. Compared with LAGB, LSG, and LRYGB, LMGB showed significant weight loss [WMD, −6.58 (95% CI, −9.37, −3.79), P<0.01 (LAGB); 2.86 (95% CI, 1.40, 5.83), P=0.004 (LSG); 10.33 (95% CI, 4.30, 16.36), P<0.01 (LRYGB)] and comparable/higher T2DM remission results [86.2% versus 55.6%, P=0.06 (LAGB); 89.1% versus 76.3%, P=0.004 (LAGB); 93.4% versus 77.6%, P=0.006 (LAGB)]; LMGB also had shorter learning curve and less operation time than LRYGB [WMD, −35.2 (95% CI, −46.94, −23.46)]. Conclusions. LMGB appeared to be effective in weight loss and T2DM remission and noninferior to other bariatric surgeries. However, clinical utility of LMGB needs to be further validated by future prospective randomized controlled trials.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (93 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
quan2015gastroenterologyefficacy
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Yingjun Quan;Ao Huang;Min Ye;Ming Xu;Biao Zhuang;Peng Zhang;Bo Yu;Zhijun Min |
| Journal | colloids and surfaces a: physicochemical and engineering aspects |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2015/152852
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.