the applicability of the eu charter of fundamental rights: national measures
Clicks: 95
ID: 254949
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
28.2
/100
95 views
21 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #199 of 221 articles by views in Environmental monitoring and assessment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 221 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
After the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009, the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights (‘the Charter’) has found a place among the formal sources of EU law, and has become a standard of review for the validity of EU acts. It became legally binding for EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, but also to the Member States. Even after the entry into force of the Charter’, some doubts regarding its legal effects are still looming large. Among them is whether, and to what extent, the Charter applies to national measures that are connected to EU law but are not intended to implement it directly. This legal uncertainty affects the position of individuals seeking to assert their fundamental rights before a national judge. In particular, whereas the application of the Charter warrants disapplication of the conflicting national measures, the same remedy is often not available when plaintiffs rely only on other fundamental rights instruments (like the European Convention on Human Rights or national constitutions). There is no doubt that the borderline between EU law and national law is not always easy to establish in a concrete case. This article discusses theoretical and practical problems arising out of the application and interpretation of Article 51(1) of the Charter, according to which the Charter is addressed to the Member States ‘only when they are implementing Union law’.
| Reference Key |
andreevska2015challengesthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Elena ANDREEVSKA |
| Journal | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.