perbedaan pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran course review horay dan quantum teaching dilihat dari hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas 3 sd
Clicks: 195
ID: 254020
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
195 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #9 of 39 articles by views in belleten
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Mathematics is a numerical study that has a strong relation to countings. Learning method of Course Review Horay and Quantum Teaching could arise students’ enthusiasm to get good grades. Purpose of this study was to observe differences in Mathematics learning result using learning model of Course Review Horay and Quantum Teaching. This was an experiment research type Quasi Experiment design Nonequivalent Pretest-Postest Control Grup Design. Test result between group of experiment and control showed there was an equivalent. Technic of collecting data was through observation and test. Participants of this study were students 3A of SD Kristen Satya Wacana as Experiment group and students 3B of SD Negeri Salatiga 6 as Control group. Data was analysed using T-test with Independent Sample t-test technique with 5% significance level (α = 0,05). The result showed that there was significant difference in applying Course Review Horay learning and Quantum Teaching learning model. It was proven in t-test posttest showed t-calculate was -4,642 with sig.(2-tailed) adalah 0,000 < 0,05 to df 48 obtained t table value = 2,011 with t-test gain score which showed the value of t calculate was -2,687 with sig.(2-tailed) 0,010 < 0,05 to df 48 obtained t table = 2,011.
| Reference Key |
romadhoni2018scholaria:perbedaan
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mesti Fajar Romadhoni;Stefanus C. Relmasira |
| Journal | belleten |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i1.p93-104
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.