satisfied in poverty? on machiavelli’s argument of social division

Clicks: 10
ID: 250446
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #21 of 23 articles by views in nanomedicine (london, england)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The article aims to reconstruct the famous thesis about the social division between powerful and the people, as it is presented in Machiavelli’s major works, in order to show some important normative implications, it has for the contemporary political theory. Particularly, it brings about the conceptual position of “people” in Maquiavelli’s argument understood as a necessarily positional function under centralized political authorities. Finally, the article tries to present, in very broad strokes, two alternative appropriations of the argument. The notion of “people” plays two distinctive roles in each of these traditions, respectively, as an important tool against social oppression, and as the only possible source for political legitimacy.
Reference Key
petroni2016semina:satisfied Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Lucas Cardoso Petroni
Journal nanomedicine (london, england)
Year 2016
DOI
10.5433/1679-0383.2016v37n1p103
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.