collection development and user experience symposia
Clicks: 262
ID: 249973
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
74.7
/100
261 views
213 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
In September 2017, Weave reached out to a number of academic and public librarians with the hope of instigating and documenting the conversation they might have with one another about the user experience issues facing collection development and e-resources librarians.
The conversation below unfolded over email between Monday, September 11 and Friday, September 15, 2017. It has been lightly edited for clarity.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (58 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
michelle2018weave:collection
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Boisvenue-Fox, Michelle;Chilton, Galadriel;Dollar, Daniel;Hanson, Cody;Hosoi, Mihoko; Kuchta, Alison;Matsumoto, Daniel;Reidsma, Matthew |
| Journal | pandecta: research law journal |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.804
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.