collection development and user experience symposia

Clicks: 350
ID: 249973
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #4 of 5 articles by views in pandecta: research law journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In September 2017, Weave reached out to a number of academic and public librarians with the hope of instigating and documenting the conversation they might have with one another about the user experience issues facing collection development and e-resources librarians. The conversation below unfolded over email between Monday, September 11 and Friday, September 15, 2017. It has been lightly edited for clarity.
Reference Key
michelle2018weave:collection Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Boisvenue-Fox, Michelle;Chilton, Galadriel;Dollar, Daniel;Hanson, Cody;Hosoi, Mihoko; Kuchta, Alison;Matsumoto, Daniel;Reidsma, Matthew
Journal pandecta: research law journal
Year 2018
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.804
URL
Keywords
bibliography information resources library science

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.