comparison of surface meteorological measurements in tract database 4
Clicks: 38
ID: 249800
1996
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
11.1
/100
38 views
18 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #409 of 484 articles by views in journal of food measurement and characterization
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 484 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The observational systems utilised during the
TRACT experimental campaign (September 1992) can roughly be divided into:
existing climate stations and towers: background chemical monitoring stations;
aerological measurements; instrumented aircraft; and special micrometeorological
stations operated only during the experimental period. Database 4, which
contains the latter surface measurements, includes station descriptions and data
from 21 sites operated by nine different groups during the campaign period.
These data will be described briefly. There are a number of advantages in using
a relational database for analysis of this data. Without creating an
unnecessarily large database which is awkward to view and slow to process,
specific measurements can be selected easily since data from each site have been
standardized using a common time index. This allows comparison of the same or
different variables from one or more sites for investigating data quality or the
effects of site location. Data can readily be combined into hourly or daily
averages or time series for comparison with other data sets (e.g. model or
aircraft data). Spatial analysis is also straightforward, although the
clustering of the sites in the centre of the investigation area means that care
must be taken. Some preliminary comparisons are made here in order to
demonstrate the availability and reliability of the data.
| Reference Key |
barthelmie1996annalescomparison
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;R. J. Barthelmie;N. O. Jensen |
| Journal | journal of food measurement and characterization |
| Year | 1996 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s00585-996-0574-9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.