sensitivity of aerosol retrieval to geometrical configuration of ground-based sun/sky radiometer observations
Clicks: 91
ID: 249547
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
27.0
/100
91 views
22 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #689 of 850 articles by views in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 850 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A sensitivity study of aerosol retrievals to the geometrical configuration of
the ground-based sky radiometer observations is carried out through inversion
tests. Specifically, this study is focused on principal plane and almucantar
observations, since these geometries are employed in AERONET (AErosol RObotic
NETwork). The following effects have been analyzed with simulated data for
both geometries: sensitivity of the retrieval to variability of the observed
scattering angle range, uncertainties in the assumptions of the aerosol
vertical distribution, surface reflectance, possible instrument pointing
errors, and the effects of the finite field of view. The synthetic
observations of radiometer in the tests were calculated using a previous
climatology data set of retrieved aerosol properties over three AERONET
sites: Mongu (Zambia) for biomass burning aerosol, Goddard Space Flight
Center (GSFC; Maryland, USA) for urban aerosol and Solar Village (Saudi
Arabia) for desert dust aerosol. The results show that almucantar retrievals,
in general, are more reliable than principal plane retrievals in presence of
the analyzed error sources. This fact partially can be explained by practical
advantages of the almucantar geometry: the symmetry between its left and
right branches that helps to eliminate some observational uncertainties and
the constant value of optical mass during the measurements, that make
almucantar observations nearly independent of the vertical variability of
aerosol. Nevertheless, almucantar retrievals present instabilities at high
sun elevations due to the reduction of the scattering angle range coverage,
resulting in decrease of information content. It is in such conditions that
principal plane retrievals show a better stability, as shown by the
simulation analysis of the three different aerosol models.
The last part of the study is devoted to the identification of possible differences between the aerosol retrieval results obtained from real AERONET data using both geometries. In particular, we have compared AERONET retrievals at the same sites used in the simulation analysis: Mongu (biomass burning), GSFC (urban) and Solar Village (desert dust). Overall, this analysis shows robust consistency between the retrievals from simultaneous observations in principle plane and almucantar All identified differences are within the uncertainties estimated for the AERONET operational aerosol retrieval. The differences in the size distribution are generally under 10% for radii between 0.1 μm and 5 μm, and outside this size range, the differences can be as large as 50%. For the absorption parameters, i.e., single scattering albedo and the imaginary part of the refractive index, the differences are typically under 0.01 and 0.003, respectively. The real part of the refractive index showed a difference of 0.01 for biomass burning and urban aerosol, and a difference of around 0.03 for desert dust. Finally, it should be noted that the whole data set includes only 200 pairs, which have been taken under very stable atmospheric conditions; therefore, in a general case, differences between principal plane (PPL) and almucantar (ALM) are expected to be higher. Though the observed differences between ALM and PPL are rather small, it should be noted that this analysis has been conducted using a limited set of 200 observation pairs selected under stable atmospheric conditions.
The last part of the study is devoted to the identification of possible differences between the aerosol retrieval results obtained from real AERONET data using both geometries. In particular, we have compared AERONET retrievals at the same sites used in the simulation analysis: Mongu (biomass burning), GSFC (urban) and Solar Village (desert dust). Overall, this analysis shows robust consistency between the retrievals from simultaneous observations in principle plane and almucantar All identified differences are within the uncertainties estimated for the AERONET operational aerosol retrieval. The differences in the size distribution are generally under 10% for radii between 0.1 μm and 5 μm, and outside this size range, the differences can be as large as 50%. For the absorption parameters, i.e., single scattering albedo and the imaginary part of the refractive index, the differences are typically under 0.01 and 0.003, respectively. The real part of the refractive index showed a difference of 0.01 for biomass burning and urban aerosol, and a difference of around 0.03 for desert dust. Finally, it should be noted that the whole data set includes only 200 pairs, which have been taken under very stable atmospheric conditions; therefore, in a general case, differences between principal plane (PPL) and almucantar (ALM) are expected to be higher. Though the observed differences between ALM and PPL are rather small, it should be noted that this analysis has been conducted using a limited set of 200 observation pairs selected under stable atmospheric conditions.
| Reference Key |
torres2014atmosphericsensitivity
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;B. Torres;O. Dubovik;C. Toledano;A. Berjon;V. E. Cachorro;T. Lapyonok;P. Litvinov;P. Goloub |
| Journal | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.5194/acp-14-847-2014
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.