attenuation correction for small animal pet images: a comparison of two methods

Clicks: 108
ID: 248750
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #161 of 191 articles by views in advanced functional materials

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 191 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In order to extract quantitative parameters from PET images, several physical effects such as photon attenuation, scatter, and partial volume must be taken into account. The main objectives of this work were the evaluation of photon attenuation in small animals and the implementation of two attenuation correction methods based on X-rays CT and segmentation of emission images. The accuracy of the first method with respect to the beam hardening effect was investigated by using Monte Carlo simulations. Mouse- and rat-sized phantoms were acquired in order to evaluate attenuation correction in terms of counts increment and recovery of uniform activity concentration. Both methods were applied to mice and rat images acquired with several radiotracers such asF18-FDG, 11C-acetate, 68Ga-chloride, and F18-NaF. The accuracy of the proposed methods was evaluated in heart and tumour tissues using F18-FDG images and in liver, kidney, and spinal column tissues using C11-acetate, Ga68-chloride, and F18-NaF images, respectively. In vivo results from animal studies show that, except for bone scans, differences between the proposed methods were about 10% in rats and 3% in mice. In conclusion, both methods provide equivalent results; however, the segmentation-based approach has several advantages being less time consuming and simple to implement.
Reference Key
d'ambrosio2013computationalattenuation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Daniela D'Ambrosio;Federico Zagni;Antonello E. Spinelli;Mario Marengo
Journal advanced functional materials
Year 2013
DOI
10.1155/2013/103476
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.