acknowledgement to reviewers of cosmetics in 2017
Clicks: 183
ID: 248288
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
183 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #21 of 21 articles by views in journal of molecular catalysis a: chemical
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Peer review is an essential part in the publication process, ensuring that Cosmetics maintains high quality standards for its published papers. In 2017, a total of 57 papers were published in the journal.[...]
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (31 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
office2018cosmeticsacknowledgement
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Cosmetics Editorial Office |
| Journal | journal of molecular catalysis a: chemical |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.3390/cosmetics5010012
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.