como aprimorar o formato de um artigo científico how to improve the structure of a scientific article
Clicks: 158
ID: 247985
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
158 views
22 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #61 of 74 articles by views in research on biomedical engineering
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Os artigos continuam sendo a principal maneira de divulgação científica nos meios especializados. Tem sido observado que muitos dos artigos submetidos à Horticultura Brasileira seguem as normas para publicação, mas apresentam problemas em seu formato. Os problemas mais comuns são sua extensão (muito longos ou curtos), título inadequado, resumo e "abstract" diferentes em tamanho e conteúdo, falta de uma proporção entre as divisões do artigo e excesso de tabelas e figuras ou com tamanho inadequado. Para determinar-se o artigo "ideal" em termos de tamanho e formato foi realizado um levantamento em dez artigos publicados na Horticultura Brasileira, Fitopatologia Brasileira, HortScience e Plant Disease de 2000 e 2001. Como resultado, obteve-se as seguintes médias: título, 14 palavras; número de autores, 4; número de instituições dos autores, 2; número de palavras-chave, 3; número de key-words, 3; resumo, 200 palavras; abstract, 202; introdução, 470 palavras; material e métodos, 640 palavras; resultados e discussão, 890 palavras; número de artigos citados, 24; número de tabelas e figuras, 2-3; número de páginas impressas, 5. Esta proporção pode servir como um guia e um modelo em relação ao tamanho e formato do artigo. A apresentação adequada de um artigo, aliada ao seu conteúdo e qualidade científica, podem acelerar sua tramitação e publicação, além de agradar aos leitores.
Research articles are the most important way to broadcast science among the specialized journals. Many of the articles submitted to publication in Horticultura Brasileira follow established guidelines, but show format problems, such as size (too long or too short), abstracts in Portuguese and English different in content and size, lack of proportion among the article sections, excess of tables and figures or inadequate size of illustrations. A survey on ten articles published in 2000 and 2001 by Horticultura Brasileira, Fitopatologia Brasileira, HortScience and Plant Disease journals showed an interesting statistical tendency, considered here as an "ideal" article for size and format. The following averages were obtained: title, 14 words; author number, 4; institutions, 2; keywords (in English and Portuguese), 3; abstract (in English and Portuguese), respectively 202 and 200 words; introduction, 470 words; material and methods, 640 words; results and discussion, 890 words; number of cited articles, 24; number of tables and figures, 2-3; number of published pages, 5. This proportion can only serve as a model or a practical guide considering the size and the format of a scientific article. An adequate presentation of an article and a good scientific quality can speed the publishing process, and please more readers.
Research articles are the most important way to broadcast science among the specialized journals. Many of the articles submitted to publication in Horticultura Brasileira follow established guidelines, but show format problems, such as size (too long or too short), abstracts in Portuguese and English different in content and size, lack of proportion among the article sections, excess of tables and figures or inadequate size of illustrations. A survey on ten articles published in 2000 and 2001 by Horticultura Brasileira, Fitopatologia Brasileira, HortScience and Plant Disease journals showed an interesting statistical tendency, considered here as an "ideal" article for size and format. The following averages were obtained: title, 14 words; author number, 4; institutions, 2; keywords (in English and Portuguese), 3; abstract (in English and Portuguese), respectively 202 and 200 words; introduction, 470 words; material and methods, 640 words; results and discussion, 890 words; number of cited articles, 24; number of tables and figures, 2-3; number of published pages, 5. This proportion can only serve as a model or a practical guide considering the size and the format of a scientific article. An adequate presentation of an article and a good scientific quality can speed the publishing process, and please more readers.
| Reference Key |
henz2003horticulturacomo
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Gilmar Paulo Henz |
| Journal | research on biomedical engineering |
| Year | 2003 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0102-05362003000200004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.