does attitude hinder or help selecting evaluation questions?

Clicks: 118
ID: 247868
2015
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #108 of 133 articles by views in 2017 ieee international conference on communication, networks and satellite, comnetsat 2017 - proceedings

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 133 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Background: Positive attitude leads to a more successfully implementation of a change. We investigated the effect of attitudes of stakeholders toward a program on their prioritization of the program components for selecting the key question of a theory-driven evaluation with concept mapping method. Materials and Methods: During a brainstorming session, stated statements defined the program components. Then they were sorted and rated regarding the importance and feasibility of them. In addition, the attitudes of participants were assessed by a 30 items questionnaire extracted from a pool named as "50 reasons not to change." We determined and compared the consensus points of participants both with and without of considering their attitudes toward the program. Results: The participants were divided into two groups of high (45% - above the mean) and low (55% - below the mean) attitude. Brainstorming discussions generated a pool of almost 120 statements which were subsequently refined to 44 statements. Matching the rating scores between two attitude groups yielded a consensus at a higher priority than the other method. Conclusion: In the concept mapping procedure, it is crucial to reach the consensus with respect to the participants′ attitude, rather than the similarity of mean scores of feasibility and importance.
Reference Key
shams2015journaldoes Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Behzad Shams;Mostafa Dehghani
Journal 2017 ieee international conference on communication, networks and satellite, comnetsat 2017 - proceedings
Year 2015
DOI
10.4103/1735-1995.165968
URL
http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2015;volume=20;issue=6;spage=590;epage=594;aulast=Shams
Keywords
attitude valuemedicine

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.