debito pubblico e pressione fiscale. (public debt and fiscal pressure)

Clicks: 182
ID: 246786
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #44 of 184 articles by views in journal of plant resources and environment

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 184 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract


E ' opinione condivisa all'unanimità che il debito pubblico in Italia ha raggiunto un livello insostenibile . Inoltre , è opinione molto diffusa che la pressione fiscale in Italia deve rimanere costante . Il precedente parere è quasi diventata una cliché , mentre il secondo un vincolo politica . L'articolo distingue le gravi argomenti sui quali queste opinioni sono basate da quelli che sono false . L'analisi delle ragioni di insostenibilità porta l'autore a sostenere che esso è ancora maggiore se il vincolo politico sull'aumento del carico fiscale è accettata . Alcune raccomandazioni sono previste per quanto riguarda le condizioni necessarie per ridurre la crescita del debito a un tasso che non sia superiore alla crescita del PIL. L'autore conclude che la scelta l'Italia si trova di fronte non è semplicemente tra il costo di un relativamente rapido riadattamento e la ricerca di alternative che sono impossibili senza costi . Piuttosto , la scelta è tra minori costi da tenere a breve termine o costi più elevati se prolungata

It is a unanimously shared opinion that Italy's public debt has reached an unsustainable level. Furthermore, it is a very widespread opinion that the tax burden in Italy must remain constant. The former opinion has almost come to be a cliché, while the latter a political constraint. The article distinguishes the serious arguments on which these opinions are based from those that are spurious. An analysis of the reasons for unsustainability leads the author to argue that it is even greater if the political constraint on raising the tax burden is accepted. Some recommendations are provided regarding the conditions necessary to reduce the growth of debt at a rate that is not higher than the growth of GDP. The author concludes that the choice Italy faces is not simply between the cost of a relatively rapid readjustment and the search for alternatives that are impossible without costs. Rather, the choice is between smaller costs to bear in the shorter term or higher costs if protracted.


JEL: H63, H21

Reference Key
spaventa2013monetadebito Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;L. SPAVENTA
Journal journal of plant resources and environment
Year 2013
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/monetaecredito/article/view/11175
Keywords
italy demography tax burdenfinanceeconomic theory

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.