scientific shores for philosophy

Clicks: 173
ID: 246053
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #12 of 22 articles by views in cardiovascular drugs and therapy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

A thesis that philosophy is not (and even cannot and has not to be) science is posed and discussed. The main argument is that science investigates an object and forms a knowledge of it, while philosophy ponders over an object or the world on the whole but does not investigate anything. Contrast between science and philosophy becomes more and more distinct under conditions of postmodernism because of serious doubts as to the status of science.

 

Reference Key
konickis2011santalka:scientific Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Andrius Konickis
Journal cardiovascular drugs and therapy
Year 2011
DOI
10.3846/coactivity.2006.28
URL
http://www.cpc.vgtu.lt/index.php/cpc/article/view/93
Keywords
Science philosophy investigation postmodernismcommunication

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.