a comparison of primary unadjusted schemes in patients suffering from obsession-obligation personality disorder with a non-clinical group
Clicks: 142
ID: 245955
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
142 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #14 of 19 articles by views in journal of food composition and analysis
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate primary unadjusted schemes in patients suffering from obsession-obligation personality disorder with a non-clinical group. To this end, 50 respondents who were randomly selected from a group having obsession-obligation personality disorder (7 females and 18 males) and a non-clinical group (8 females and 17 males), completed Yang’s 90-item questionnaire of primary unadjustedschemes. The results showed that the mean and the standard deviation of the two groups were significantly different in some schemes. The Independent Samples T-Test results showed that the two groups were significantly different in self-sacrifice (t (2, 48) = 4.17; p<.001), emotional prevention (t (2, 48) = 18.81; p<.001), perseverance criteria (t (2, 48) = 18.6; p<.001), superiority (t (2, 48) = 2.82; p<.005), and self-punishment (t (2, 48) = 3.19; p<.005). The results suggest that study of schemes is an effective way for exploring fundamental factors causing personality disorder. It is suggested that further studies investigate other personality disorders.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (92 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
naderi2015mulit-ia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Habibollah Naderi;Rogeyeh Ramzanzadeh Alizamani |
| Journal | journal of food composition and analysis |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.