er den internasjonale straffedomstolen afrikafiendtlig? konfliktselektivitet og internasjonale straffedomstoler
Clicks: 135
ID: 245722
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
135 views
21 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 14 articles by views in Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
After 13 years of selecting situations, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has thus far only investigated conflicts in Africa. This has led to accusations of the Court having an African bias when selecting which conflicts to prosecute. Some African leaders have even accused the court of simply being a tool of western imperialism. This article attempts to determine the veracity of the Africa-bias allegations by examining the ICC’s current practice of selecting situations, as well as by placing the debate within the broader context of international criminal tribunals and conflict selectivity.
| Reference Key |
hgestl2016internasjonaler
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Sofie A. E. Høgestøl |
| Journal | Journal of minimally invasive gynecology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.17585/ip.v74.448
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.