chain of survival and its implementation in serbia
Clicks: 57
ID: 245590
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
16.8
/100
57 views
21 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #3 of 3 articles by views in chinese medical sciences journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Aim: Analysis of the use and implementation of the Chain of Survival or Chain of Prevention in health institutions of Serbia (Clinical Centers, Regional Hospitals and Health Centers in areas with more than 100,000 inhabitants). Method: Data analysis obtained by questionnaire which was conducted in Clinical Centers, Regional Hospitals and Health Centers. The questionnaire included five questions. Each question is part of the Chain of Survival or Chain of Prevention. Results The results were obtained by the conducted survey, which includes five links of the Chain of Prevention defined by the recommendations back to 2010. The first question in the Chain of Prevention is: Education. The results indicate that even in any environment there is no clearly defined system of personnel education internal CME to work in the institution. The second link is: Monitoring. Monitoring comes down to the notation of a certain vital parameters twice a day and sometimes only once a day. There are no forms designed to monitor vital parameters of patients either as part of national indicators of quality of work or indicators that neither has the right to establish institutions - internal indicators of quality of work, in the prehospital conditions. Fourth link of chain: Call for help. In Serbia, there are no defined teams of rapid response, which intervene to begin a special intensive care of life threatening patient. The fifth link of the chain of prevention: Response. No specially designed team, there is no evidence or liabilities of data notation on a reactive time of response. Conclusion Chain of Prevention is not implemented in the health care system in the Republic of Serbia, and there are no currently efforts for its implementation.
| Reference Key |
zlatko2016journalchain
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Fišer Zlatko;Tijanić Jelena;Budimski Mihaela |
| Journal | chinese medical sciences journal |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.