argumentative interactions between brazilian supreme court and other courts
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #22 of 26 articles by views in journal of environmental chemical engineering
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
This paper examines the argumentative interactions between the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) and other courts in order to clarify how the STF uses other court’s rulings. Using an analytical framework, the authors sought to identify whether the STF’s Justices build their reasoning based on arguments mentioned by other courts’ rulings, including foreign and transnational ones. Qualitative analysis revealed weak interactions between the STF and other courts since in most cases Brazilian Supreme Court’s Justices merely mention prior rulings, without necessarily discussing the reasoning of other courts’ decisions in order to use them as part of its own reasoning. Among the eleven cases analyzed, only in four cases we found some influence of the rulings mentioned in the definition of the legal issue and in the judicial response.
| Reference Key |
ramos2015brazilianargumentative
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Luciana de Oliveira Ramos;Aline Oliveira de Santana;Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Barros |
| Journal | journal of environmental chemical engineering |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.19092/reed.v2i1.59
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.