navigation systems in skeletal surgery
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #121 of 231 articles by views in planta medica
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 231 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
Background: Surgical navigation systems are increasingly being used during trauma and orthopaedic surgery. The conceptual design of each of these devices is similar. The authors define three major components involved in the clinical aplication of surgical navigation: a surgical object, a virtual object and a navigator. These three elements are connected by registration and referencing. There are many pitfalls in application of CAOS. Many applications will be presented and their advantages and disadvantages will be elucidated.
Conclusions: More and more studies prove the superiority of the CAOS approaches over classic techniques in a number of applications. It is essential to know the basics and the limitations of the underlying technical principles. There is a considerable chance for using these devices incorrectly. From an economical point of view only the optimal performance of a navigation system will probably justify its significant investment costs.
| Reference Key |
tivan2005zdravnikinavigation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Feri Štivan;Matej Cimerman |
| Journal | planta medica |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.