have-perfects in post-classical and early byzantine greek

Clicks: 7
ID: 243442
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this article, I analyze the use and development of periphrastic perfect constructions with the Ancient Greek verb «have» (ἔχω) in Post-classical and Early Byzantine Greek. To be more specific, I discuss the following four constructions: (a) ἔχω with active/middle aorist participle (anterior); (b) ἔχω with passive perfect participle (resultative); (c) ἔχω with passive aorist or present participle (resultative) and (d) ἔχω with active/middle aorist or present participle and a temporal adjunct (anterior). My analysis is based on a register-balanced corpus of texts, whereby I distinguish between works of a «low», «middle» and «high» register.
Reference Key
bentein2013emeritahave-perfects Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Klaas Bentein
Journal south african journal of botany
Year 2013
DOI
10.3989/emerita.2013.08.1130
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.