how “political” is quong’s political liberalism?
Clicks: 56
ID: 242240
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
16.5
/100
56 views
7 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #81 of 87 articles by views in Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this short paper I ask to what extent the sharp contrast between the
political and the comprehensive, on which political liberals such as Rawls
and Quong place primary emphasis, caters to a truly “political” conception of
liberalism. I argue that Quong’s own take on this point is more distinctively
“political” than Rawls’s, in that it assigns far less weight to citizens’
comprehensive doctrines. Indeed, I suggest that Quong’s exclusion of
comprehensive doctrines (exemplified by his worries about an “overlapping
consensus”) has more radical implications than Quong himself seems to think.
In doing so, I offer a streamlined version of Quong’s critique, which
encompasses two more or less direct criticisms of Rawls’s doctrine of the
overlapping consensus. I will call them the “sincerity objection” and the
“liberal objection”.
| Reference Key |
enrico2014filozofijahow
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Zoffoli Enrico |
| Journal | Plants (Basel, Switzerland) |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.2298/FID1401047Z
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.